Kedeha's Conjecture?

Have something to say about forums.debian.net itself?

Kedeha's Conjecture?

Postby stevepusser » 2017-09-21 23:06

kedaha wrote:...
Something I've observed on these boards is that the lower the post count the higher the tendency to install sid or testing under the mistaken belief that these are "upgrades."


Sounds legit to me. Just needs a bit of editing to formalize it...throw "inverse relationship" in there to make it all sciency and stuff. Maybe "The tendency to install Debian testing or Sid varies inversely with a newcomer's experience with Debian."
The MX Linux repositories: Backports galore! If we don't have something, just ask and we'll try--we like challenges. New packages: AzPainter 2.1.0, Pale Moon 27.5.0, Liquorix kernel 4.12-10, mpv 0.27.0, Kodi 17.3, 0ad 0.0.22, Mesa 13.0.6
User avatar
stevepusser
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53

Re: Kedeha's Conjecture?

Postby RU55EL » 2017-09-22 01:34

Huh? I have never considered my post count high, even now. But, I have never installed testing or sid. I have always installed stable (or old stable). Something must be wrong with me!

I may have to install testing, so that I can say that I did!

I guess I just like solid and reliable. New and flashy is not that important for me when it comes to computer operating systems.
User avatar
RU55EL
 
Posts: 281
Joined: 2014-04-07 03:42
Location: /home/russel

Re: Kedeha's Conjecture?

Postby Bulkley » 2017-09-22 01:55

It seems to me that low post Sid and Testing users get it trouble fairly quickly and whinge about it. Sid and Testing users shouldn't need help. They should know how to troubleshoot and should be able to rescue a machine with CLI.

I wanted to scream a week or two ago when a low poster complained that his Sid server install was having problems. :roll:

Debian is very explicit about who should use Sid and Testing. So, why do so many new users bypass Stable? Is there a web site(s) promoting these so-called upgrades?
Bulkley
 
Posts: 5283
Joined: 2006-02-11 18:35

Re: Kedeha's Conjecture?

Postby debiman » 2017-09-22 18:06

Bulkley wrote:Debian is very explicit about who should use Sid and Testing. So, why do so many new users bypass Stable?


because reasons:

- shiny new stuff syndrome
- they don't like being told what to do, and will do the opposite on purpose.
- they think they're really good tinkerers. and testing is "almost stable" anyway - until it breaks.

we've all been in that age.
User avatar
debiman
 
Posts: 1320
Joined: 2013-03-12 07:18

Re: Kedeha's Conjecture?

Postby stevepusser » 2017-09-22 18:13

debiman wrote:
Bulkley wrote:Debian is very explicit about who should use Sid and Testing. So, why do so many new users bypass Stable?

2 reasons:
- shiny new stuff syndrome
- they don't like being told what to do, and will do the opposite on purpose. we've all been in that age.


They are too used to being able to install any Shiny New Stuff on Windows, because those programs install their own versions of all their own dependencies, and they haven't learned that Debian uses a different shared library model. Those containerized systems such as AppImage, Snap, Flatpak, or the Electron app model are using the Windows model, with the advantages and disadvantages that go along with it.
The MX Linux repositories: Backports galore! If we don't have something, just ask and we'll try--we like challenges. New packages: AzPainter 2.1.0, Pale Moon 27.5.0, Liquorix kernel 4.12-10, mpv 0.27.0, Kodi 17.3, 0ad 0.0.22, Mesa 13.0.6
User avatar
stevepusser
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53

Re: Kedeha's Conjecture?

Postby sunrat » 2017-09-22 22:10

At least the newbie sid/testing users give us something to laugh at or mock. :wink: :mrgreen:

I've been running sid-based siduction or its predecessors for nearly 10 years now and barely dare to ask for help with occasional rare issues. Backups, reading upgrade warnings, and effective startpage-fu are essential.

Just noticed this is post no. 2000 for me! 8) /me shouts everyone a beer.
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ”
Remember to BACKUP!
User avatar
sunrat
 
Posts: 2016
Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Kedeha's Conjecture?

Postby Danielsan » 2017-09-23 04:14

debiman wrote:- shiny new stuff syndrome
- they don't like being told what to do, and will do the opposite on purpose.
- they think they're really good tinkerers. and testing is "almost stable" anyway - until it breaks.

we've all been in that age.


I got the three... :lol:

I have a Franken Debian I like it, I can't use a stable release the applications are too much old, especially the desktop application, I can't wait. You can setup apt dist-upgrade to be less destructive and if it is unable to solve dependencies you can just use apt upgrade until the issue is solved.
If you can't fork then hold you in silence.
User avatar
Danielsan
 
Posts: 462
Joined: 2010-10-10 22:36

Re: Kedeha's Conjecture?

Postby alan stone » 2017-09-23 06:18

Bulkley wrote:So, why do so many new users bypass Stable?

There's heart bypass, gastric bypass. Stable bypass: a brain issue?
Debian 8.9 32bit, WM: Openbox
Computers are like air conditioners. They work fine until you start opening windows. - Author Unknown
Programming is like sex. One mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life. - Michael Sinz
User avatar
alan stone
 
Posts: 185
Joined: 2011-10-22 14:08
Location: In my body.

Re: Kedeha's Conjecture?

Postby debiman » 2017-09-23 10:57

alan stone wrote:There's heart bypass, gastric bypass. Stable bypass: a brain issue?

Image
:mrgreen:
(i'm bored...)
User avatar
debiman
 
Posts: 1320
Joined: 2013-03-12 07:18

Re: Kedeha's Conjecture?

Postby Head_on_a_Stick » 2017-09-23 22:29

I myself conform to Kedeha's Conjecture — I ran sid in my early days on these boards but now that I actually know something about Debian and how it works, stable is all I use. Or maybe oldstable at a push :mrgreen:

The best things come to those who...
"Are you quite sure that all those bells and whistles, all those wonderful facilities of your so called powerful programming languages, belong to the solution set rather than the problem set?" — Edsger W. Dijkstra
User avatar
Head_on_a_Stick
 
Posts: 6578
Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
Location: /dev/chair

Re: Kedeha's Conjecture?

Postby roseway » 2017-09-24 06:21

I'm in a similar position to HoaS. I ran Testing for several years, but now I use Stable because I want to spend less time managing my system and more time using it.
Eric
User avatar
roseway
 
Posts: 1475
Joined: 2007-12-31 22:50
Location: Kent, UK

Re: Kedeha's Conjecture?

Postby jheaton5 » 2017-10-06 13:47

Interesting.
debian sid
User avatar
jheaton5
 
Posts: 1489
Joined: 2008-08-20 01:40
Location: Newnan, GA, USA

Re: Kedeha's Conjecture?

Postby GarryRicketson » 2017-10-06 13:56

Kedeha's Conjecture?
Is this what your talking about ?
User avatar
GarryRicketson
 
Posts: 4271
Joined: 2015-01-20 22:16
Location: Durango, Mexico


Return to Forum stuff & feedback

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

fashionable