Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Replace IceWeasel with FireFox
- txHarleyMan
- Posts: 366
- Joined: 2007-08-06 13:32
- Location: Texas
Here's the bottom line, dean:
I have been a developer for 26 years; 17 of these years are with Unix systems running congruent with DG mini's. My job here is not to prove anything, but to ~bump~ folks in the right direction. Once the bump has been received, it is up to /you/ to decide for yourself - research the subject and draw your own conclusions or rant and rave. I will grant you that Debian is 100x easier to install now ( since Sarge, I believe ), but if you want Debian as your production system, you will have to read and learn. I dont know everything about Debian. Not even close, but I will ask. And if I get no response, I will research the subject a lil harder until I do find the answer. And I always do.
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~awb/linux.history.html
I have been a developer for 26 years; 17 of these years are with Unix systems running congruent with DG mini's. My job here is not to prove anything, but to ~bump~ folks in the right direction. Once the bump has been received, it is up to /you/ to decide for yourself - research the subject and draw your own conclusions or rant and rave. I will grant you that Debian is 100x easier to install now ( since Sarge, I believe ), but if you want Debian as your production system, you will have to read and learn. I dont know everything about Debian. Not even close, but I will ask. And if I get no response, I will research the subject a lil harder until I do find the answer. And I always do.
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~awb/linux.history.html
txHarleyMan
Debian Etch
Debian Etch
I have been a nobody for 37 years and I hope that anyone that is going to make a statement that A is easier than B can back it up with more than a quote from a book that is a couple years old. Why are we talking about installing? We should be talking about using since that is what most people spend their time doing. I have experienced many people who are computer savvy yet could not contemplate installing windows, can not even grasp the concept of having to *install* their OS since it comes with one. Installing debian with the new installer is just as easy (if not easier) as any other installer and provides a lot more flexibility as well. As far as using the system (which should be the real test of how *easy* a system is) clicking on a firefox icon in ubuntu is just as hard as clicking on the epiphany icon in debian.txHarleyMan wrote:Here's the bottom line, dean:
I have been a developer for 26 years; 17 of these years are with Unix systems running congruent with DG mini's. My job here is not to prove anything, but to ~bump~ folks in the right direction. Once the bump has been received, it is up to /you/ to decide for yourself - research the subject and draw your own conclusions or rant and rave. I will grant you that Debian is 100x easier to install now ( since Sarge, I believe ), but if you want Debian as your production system, you will have to read and learn. I dont know everything about Debian. Not even close, but I will ask. And if I get no response, I will research the subject a lil harder until I do find the answer. And I always do.
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~awb/linux.history.html
- txHarleyMan
- Posts: 366
- Joined: 2007-08-06 13:32
- Location: Texas
Well, I am trying to do mine. Can you help? Hold my hand a bit? Give me a bump at least? I am so lost - give me some glaring examples please, something to start with, something that provides me with a starting point to discover all the discrepancy in debian.
Can you show me a system where someone can use it without reading or learning in some manner? I would be very interested in that too.
Can you show me a system where someone can use it without reading or learning in some manner? I would be very interested in that too.
- txHarleyMan
- Posts: 366
- Joined: 2007-08-06 13:32
- Location: Texas
Start here:
http://www.penguin.ch/dokuwiki/doku.php/debian:intro
The owner of this site is a friend of mine in Switzerland.
Now, I never said Debian and Discrepancies together. The point I am trying to make is, in my opinion, Debian is the best out here. But if you want to learn to administer it /properly/, there is a learning curve that goes along with it.
http://www.penguin.ch/dokuwiki/doku.php/debian:intro
The owner of this site is a friend of mine in Switzerland.
Now, I never said Debian and Discrepancies together. The point I am trying to make is, in my opinion, Debian is the best out here. But if you want to learn to administer it /properly/, there is a learning curve that goes along with it.
txHarleyMan
Debian Etch
Debian Etch
- txHarleyMan
- Posts: 366
- Joined: 2007-08-06 13:32
- Location: Texas
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 2014-08-22 21:50
Re: Replace IceWeasel with FireFox
Problem IceWeasel does not work with most of the sites I need to use. I don't like Firefox, but it does work. even
Opera works better than IceWeasel and I like it.
Opera works better than IceWeasel and I like it.
Re: Replace IceWeasel with FireFox
Talk about reviving an old thread
...flashback to 2007
Iceweasel is essentially Firefox. Kindly provide any website links that don't work on Iceweasel. I've been using it daily for several months and have yet to find even one website that doesn't work.
...flashback to 2007
Iceweasel is essentially Firefox. Kindly provide any website links that don't work on Iceweasel. I've been using it daily for several months and have yet to find even one website that doesn't work.
800mhz, 512mb ram, dCore-jessie (Tiny Core with Debian Jessie packages) with BusyBox and Fluxbox.
Most don't have computer access, reuse or pay forward an old computer.
Most don't have computer access, reuse or pay forward an old computer.
Re: Replace IceWeasel with FireFox
I use both on different machines (along with PaleMoon, another Firefox respin), and as has been noted on here so many times before, even if they are not identical, they are all but indistinguishable.
It's true that one must occasionally spoof the UA to get a few badly crafted Websites to work, but that's hardly the fault of the browser.
It's true that one must occasionally spoof the UA to get a few badly crafted Websites to work, but that's hardly the fault of the browser.
Re: Replace IceWeasel with FireFox
Another happy PaleMoon user - cool
800mhz, 512mb ram, dCore-jessie (Tiny Core with Debian Jessie packages) with BusyBox and Fluxbox.
Most don't have computer access, reuse or pay forward an old computer.
Most don't have computer access, reuse or pay forward an old computer.
Re: Replace IceWeasel with FireFox
The title: "Replace IceWeasel with FireFox".
I would have said: "Replace Iceweasel with Icecat", likely more compatible with Debian.
I would have said: "Replace Iceweasel with Icecat", likely more compatible with Debian.
Re: Replace IceWeasel with FireFox
That necrobump tho.
I would exchange everything I know in exchange for half of what I don't.