Code: Select all
$ uname -a
Linux lenovo-debian 4.11.0-7.slh.3-aptosid-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT aptosid 4.11-16 (2017-06-27) x86_64 GNU/Linux
Code: Select all
$ uname -a
Linux lenovo-debian 4.11.0-7.slh.3-aptosid-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT aptosid 4.11-16 (2017-06-27) x86_64 GNU/Linux
bester69 wrote:STOP 2030 globalists demons, keep the fight for humanity freedom against NWO...
Same here, if the highest LTS works good, I use it and stick with it, and keep it updated.bester69 wrote:I stopped installing and testing new kernels.
I found out according to my tests, that ubuntu's kernel 4.4.39 can't be improved in terms of performance and behavior with my laptop (Acer Extensa 5230).
I dont even try anymore with any other kernels. , this kernel works perfect in this model.
bester69 wrote:STOP 2030 globalists demons, keep the fight for humanity freedom against NWO...
Doesn't help you with spelling thoughbester69 wrote:...
definitlly i have some kind of weird psychic ability or superpower.. , seriouslly.
Phoronix needs to throw away all their scientific testing computers and programs and just hire you to test kernels by "feels", then.anticapitalista wrote:Doesn't help you with spelling thoughbester69 wrote:...
definitlly i have some kind of weird psychic ability or superpower.. , seriouslly.
I think this must be a some kind of ability similar /analogous to wine testing, I really got it. , You think, if i werent able to feel it i would have some incertitude about which ones is performing better....Its just i find it a curious thing-stevepusser wrote:Phoronix needs to throw away all their scientific testing computers and programs and just hire you to test kernels by "feels", then.anticapitalista wrote:Doesn't help you with spelling thoughbester69 wrote:...
definitlly i have some kind of weird psychic ability or superpower.. , seriouslly.
Steve...currently testing backported 4.14-2.3 Liquorix kernel.
bester69 wrote:STOP 2030 globalists demons, keep the fight for humanity freedom against NWO...
Code: Select all
empty@Xanadu:~ $ cat /proc/version
Linux version 4.14.3-1-zen (builduser@heftig-32259) (gcc version 7.2.1 20171128 (GCC)) #1 ZEN SMP PREEMPT Thu Nov 30 11:33:39 UTC 2017
empty@Xanadu:~ $
Whoa! Harsh but accurate.Head_on_a_Stick wrote:@bester69, everybody here thinks that you are completely full of sh*t
At first I didn't understand why the apology,... any way no problem, these daysEDIT: added asterisk (sorry Garry!).
One could also say:Shite is a common variant in British and Irish English.[1] As a slang term, it has many meanings, including: nonsense, foolishness, something of little value or quality, trivial and usually boastful or inaccurate talk, or a contemptible person. It could also be used to refer to any other noun in general, or to be used as an expression of annoyance, surprise, or anger.
instead ofel es lleno de chorra
But actually in a way, I guess I am the same, I must have some kind of weird psychic ability or superpower, or like he says , on the wine tasting,... I don't have any "scientific" proof, but this kernel :full of sh*t
Code: Select all
$ uname -a
OpenBSD 6.2 GENERIC.MP#0 amd64
Code: Select all
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free
I think you need to run syspatch(8), that's the -release kernel.GarryRicketson wrote:Code: Select all
$ uname -a OpenBSD 6.2 GENERIC.MP#0 amd64
Code: Select all
Puffy: ~ $ uname -a
OpenBSD Puffy.lan 6.2 GENERIC.MP#237 amd64
Puffy: ~ $
The upstream kernel fixes for security issues are very quickly patched into Debian stable (and oldstable) kernels, only the testing kernel gets left behind (thanks to the mandatory 10-14 day transition delay from sid) and they even patch that early if it's serious enough.ticojohn wrote:security updates
Thanks for that feedback. I'm running Jessie i386 as my main use system and it of course has an older kernel. But knowing that security patches still take place as long as it is on LTS gives some piece of mind. I don't feel the need to always be updating just to say I have the latest and greatest. Security and stability are much more important to me. Great answer HOAS!Head_on_a_Stick wrote:The security conscious would be better advised to run one of the LTS kernel branches anyway (as Debian does) because any new features will always introduce the possibility of new vulnerabilities.ticojohn wrote:security updates
Interesting, I have been running 'syspatch', in fact just ran it again now,-current is 237 patches ahead
Code: Select all
# syspatch
Get/Verify syspatch62-002_fktrace... Get/Verify syspatch62-002_fktrace... Get/Verify syspatch62-002_fktrace... Get/Verify syspatch62-002_fktrace... Get/Verify syspatch62-002_fktrace... Get/Verify syspatch62-002_fktrace... 100% 785 KB 00:04
Installing patch 002_fktrace
Relinking to create unique kernel... done.
# uname -a
OpenBSD garry.garry.org 6.2 GENERIC.MP#0 amd64
What kernel do you use
Code: Select all
uname -a
OpenBSD garry.garry.org 6.2 GENERIC.MP#1 amd64
Like wise, I do not use the "current", it keeps changing to fast for me. I just wait until the next upgrade, which will be in November, however I do runI've never used -release or -stable
Code: Select all
uname -a
Linux antix1 4.14.2-antix.1-amd64-smp #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Nov 25 20:09:07 EET 2017 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Hmmm...it's fitting that you picked wine tasting, since that's also been shown to be mostly BS via blinded tests. Dowsers also fool themselves into thinking they have some amazing power, yet fail every scientific test, notably ones where they agreed to every condition beforehand, then try and make excuses afterwards. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way ... find-pipesbester69 wrote: I think this must be a some kind of ability similar /analogous to wine testing, I really got it. , You think, if i werent able to feel it i would have some incertitude about which ones is performing better....Its just i find it a curious thing-