Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
What desktop are you using?
- dust hill resident
- Posts: 240
- Joined: 2007-05-18 13:31
What desktop are you using?
This kind of poll has undoubtedly been done before, but I think it'd be a good time to do it again to get more up to date information.
What desktop do you use? If you use several, choose the one you use the most.
What desktop do you use? If you use several, choose the one you use the most.
Re: What desktop are you using?
What about Pantheon or Budgie?
Dell Latitude E7280 with Intel i7, 16 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD
Debian Testing
surviving in a Windows world with Virtualbox and Codeweavers Crossover
Debian Testing
surviving in a Windows world with Virtualbox and Codeweavers Crossover
Re: What desktop are you using?
i3wm on desktop and laptops. Mostly because I don't like the bloat on DEs. Not that my devices couldn't handle them, but they're just so... fat.
I've been thinking of trying herbsluft or openbox, but I haven't got around to do it yet.
I've been thinking of trying herbsluft or openbox, but I haven't got around to do it yet.
Debian 12 Stable with sway
Secure your stuff: Securing Debian Manual
Don't break your stuff: Source List Management DontBreakDebian
Secure your stuff: Securing Debian Manual
Don't break your stuff: Source List Management DontBreakDebian
- None1975
- df -h | participant
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: 2015-11-29 18:23
- Location: Russia, Kaliningrad
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 69 times
Re: What desktop are you using?
Ratpoison and Herbstluftwm.
OS: Debian 12.4 Bookworm / DE: Enlightenment
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github
-
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: 2015-08-30 20:14
Re: What desktop are you using?
I use GNOME. No reason not to, since it's a complete DE, has everything I need OOTB and my laptop is more than capable of running it.
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: 2007-12-14 23:16
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: What desktop are you using?
Another herbstluftwm user.
I hate using a desktop environment, I much prefer window managers.
I hate using a desktop environment, I much prefer window managers.
antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com
https://antixlinux.com
Re: What desktop are you using?
I use Openbox by the same reason, plus it doesn't change behaviour with every update. I might be running testing, but i prefer my desktop to be stable.kopper wrote:i3wm on desktop and laptops. Mostly because I don't like the bloat on DEs. Not that my devices couldn't handle them, but they're just so... fat.
Bullseye amd64, AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Buster amd64, Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
Sid ppc, PowerPC 7447a
Sid ppc64, PowerPC 970FX
Buster amd64, Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
Sid ppc, PowerPC 7447a
Sid ppc64, PowerPC 970FX
-
- df -h | grep > 20TiB
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: 2012-10-06 05:31
- Location: /dev/chair
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 191 times
Re: What desktop are you using?
KDE, since version 1.0. Nothing else has enough knobs.
I tried using a couple of other DEs recently, (MATE, Cinnamon) and everywhere I look there's behaviour I want to change and no configuration options.
Why can't I edit the toolbars in every application? Why are normal settings hidden in some obscure gconf key? Reminds me why I dumped everything gnome after 1.6. Simpler != better.
I tried GNOME3 too, for as long as I could put up with it. The UI is just horrific. Client-side window decorations? Hamburger menus? Tiles? WTF? And no obvious way to turn this garbage off.
KDE has plenty of features I don't want too, but at least reverting to a traditional desktop layout is simple.
That and the bundled applications. Kate, in particular, is awesome. A good 90% of my favourite applications are QT.
On machines where the overhead of KDE is noticeable, I run LXQT.
I tried using a couple of other DEs recently, (MATE, Cinnamon) and everywhere I look there's behaviour I want to change and no configuration options.
Why can't I edit the toolbars in every application? Why are normal settings hidden in some obscure gconf key? Reminds me why I dumped everything gnome after 1.6. Simpler != better.
I tried GNOME3 too, for as long as I could put up with it. The UI is just horrific. Client-side window decorations? Hamburger menus? Tiles? WTF? And no obvious way to turn this garbage off.
KDE has plenty of features I don't want too, but at least reverting to a traditional desktop layout is simple.
That and the bundled applications. Kate, in particular, is awesome. A good 90% of my favourite applications are QT.
On machines where the overhead of KDE is noticeable, I run LXQT.
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.
Re: What desktop are you using?
MATE with Compiz via Stevepusser gives me all the bells and whistles I need.
- sunrat
- Administrator
- Posts: 6476
- Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Has thanked: 118 times
- Been thanked: 474 times
Re: What desktop are you using?
KDE here too. Plasma 5.10 is the most well-behaved DE I've ever used and a marked improvement on 5.8 which is currently in Stretch. Kate and Konsole are excellent. Dolphin is the best file manager ever. I find myself using its F4 drop-down console a lot lately. And of course KDE Connect which integrates some neat phone features such as file transfer and media player control, SMS on desktop, and using phone as a desktop pointing device.
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!
-
- df -h | grep > 20TiB
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: 2012-10-06 05:31
- Location: /dev/chair
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 191 times
Re: What desktop are you using?
Plasma 5.11.5 is even bettersunrat wrote:Plasma 5.10 is the most well-behaved DE I've ever used and a marked improvement on 5.8 which is currently in Stretch.
I was actually a bit miffed when dolphin replaced konqueror as the default file manager, but it's come a long way since then.
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.
Re: What desktop are you using?
None, running headless on a VPS (and Raspbian - which is Debian based on a headless Pi).
- Head_on_a_Stick
- Posts: 14114
- Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
- Location: London, England
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
- Nili
- Posts: 441
- Joined: 2014-04-30 14:04
- Location: $HOME/♫♪
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: What desktop are you using?
Back on spectrwm. After on a relatively time with herbstluftwm returning back on spectrwm. I have to affirm the latter is way faster WM and floats works good. I'm getting straight away at spectrwm.conf.
openSUSE Tumbleweed KDE/Wayland
♫♪ Elisa playing...
Damascus Cocktail ♪ Black Reverie ♪ Dye the sky.
♫♪ Elisa playing...
Damascus Cocktail ♪ Black Reverie ♪ Dye the sky.
Re: What desktop are you using?
I use mate. I always used Gnome2 and when that got done away with I tried Gnome3 for some time with the classic look but decided that mate was for me. I don't chop and change.
DebianStable
Code: Select all
$ vrms
No non-free or contrib packages installed on debian! rms would be proud.
Re: What desktop are you using?
i3 or xfce4, depending on my mood.
Sometimes I use gnome, too, but I have a love-hate relationship with it and detest the attitude of the developers, which tends to be very dismissive of the needs of anyone who doesn't fit their target demographic (very casual / unsophisticated users) and relies on difficult to maintain extensions that break with every release to be palatable or modify essential settings. Also, I'm afraid Gnome will prematurely drop support for X11 before Wayland is actually fully functional and useable in more than just casual/basic use cases. As things are going now, it will be a very long time before I can do everything on Wayland that I can do on X, and gnome's reputation is not so good when it comes to retaining functionality that users rely on.
Sometimes I use gnome, too, but I have a love-hate relationship with it and detest the attitude of the developers, which tends to be very dismissive of the needs of anyone who doesn't fit their target demographic (very casual / unsophisticated users) and relies on difficult to maintain extensions that break with every release to be palatable or modify essential settings. Also, I'm afraid Gnome will prematurely drop support for X11 before Wayland is actually fully functional and useable in more than just casual/basic use cases. As things are going now, it will be a very long time before I can do everything on Wayland that I can do on X, and gnome's reputation is not so good when it comes to retaining functionality that users rely on.
Re: What desktop are you using?
^ ah, that's eloquent. well spoken.
anyhow, i'm glad to see the "simple X windowmanager" voters are in the lead!
XFCE as a clear second also isn't too shabby, esp. considering it's not debian's default desktop.
anyhow, i'm glad to see the "simple X windowmanager" voters are in the lead!
XFCE as a clear second also isn't too shabby, esp. considering it's not debian's default desktop.