Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

Has anyone tried Polo File Manager?

Graphical Environments, Managers, Multimedia & Desktop questions.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Has anyone tried Polo File Manager?

#1 Post by stevepusser »

https://github.com/teejee2008/polo/wiki

I had a devil of a time packaging it for MX 17 until I backported and used the valac from Buster to compile it, but the deb they provide for download in the github release section also works fine in Stretch.

I'm still trying to explore all the features---I found a good home page for it yesterday, but seem to have lost it now. :(

Wait, here it is: https://teejee2008.github.io/polo/
MX Linux packager and developer

Segfault
Posts: 993
Joined: 2005-09-24 12:24
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Has anyone tried Polo File Manager?

#2 Post by Segfault »

Not that I'm against paid software ... but closed source plugin?

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Has anyone tried Polo File Manager?

#3 Post by stevepusser »

Segfault wrote:Not that I'm against paid software ... but closed source plugin?
Yeah, we just are using the open version. I want to see if my Google Drive works with Stretch's rclone...got a lot to do today first, though.

What, are we going to send RMS to rough him up for trying to support himself? :D
MX Linux packager and developer

Segfault
Posts: 993
Joined: 2005-09-24 12:24
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Has anyone tried Polo File Manager?

#4 Post by Segfault »

Wait a minute ... can't find the source to build it. The whole thing is closed source?

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Has anyone tried Polo File Manager?

#5 Post by stevepusser »

Segfault wrote:Wait a minute ... can't find the source to build it. The whole thing is closed source?
No, it's on github: https://github.com/teejee2008/polo

I got the release tarball from the releases: https://github.com/teejee2008/polo/releases

The source has a debian folder in it to ease packaging, but it needs some updating, and it also lists dependencies manually that dh_shlibs actually automatically adds. I fixed those for the MX 17 build, but did not bump up the minimum version of valac. I'll do that for the next 18.4 release, which is supposed to be soon.

http://mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo/pool/test ... e-manager/

I should probably open an issue on github to make the debian folder more "professional".
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Has anyone tried Polo File Manager?

#6 Post by stevepusser »

Are you using upstream Debian? I also think I found a minor packaging bug in Homebank when I backported it for MX, in that it no longer need libgtk2.0-dev as a build-depend since it's GTK 3 now, but reportbug doesn't like MX. :roll:
MX Linux packager and developer

Segfault
Posts: 993
Joined: 2005-09-24 12:24
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Has anyone tried Polo File Manager?

#7 Post by Segfault »

I see, thanks. Requires vala compiler ... I'm not about to install it now.

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Has anyone tried Polo File Manager?

#8 Post by stevepusser »

Theirs or the MX debs will install and run on plain Stretch or Buster, if you don't want to install valac--which really isn't that big anyway.
MX Linux packager and developer

Innovate
Posts: 188
Joined: 2015-12-27 01:28

Re: Has anyone tried Polo File Manager?

#9 Post by Innovate »

Long ago since 2017 on 17.10 version.
Even I was the first guy that discovered Timeshift & build them since debian 8.8 era.
Even before Mint was discover Timeshift.

To build raw on debian 9 you need to build gee, vte & valac before able to build the latest version.
But there's a hit miss from build package I don't know why. Sometimes it success sometimes it failed & still
report error glib deprecated. even already build latest gee, vte & valac dependency versions it's still hit & miss.

It looks luxurious like split image of dolphin in GTK perfect Thunar replacement for Xfce
however but it's still lack of some trivial feature(I can't remember but critical) opposite from Thunar have.
You're thought about planning polo for your default Xfce fm for MX distro
& surprise other Xfce distro competitors don't you?

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Has anyone tried Polo File Manager?

#10 Post by stevepusser »

Innovate wrote:Long ago since 2017 on 17.10 version.
Even I was the first guy that discovered Timeshift & build them since debian 8.8 era.
Even before Mint was discover Timeshift.

To build raw on debian 9 you need to build gee, vte & valac before able to build the latest version.
But there's a hit miss from build package I don't know why. Sometimes it success sometimes it failed & still
report error glib deprecated. even already build latest gee, vte & valac dependency versions it's still hit & miss.

It looks luxurious like split image of dolphin in GTK perfect Thunar replacement for Xfce
however but it's still lack of some trivial feature(I can't remember but critical) opposite from Thunar have.
You're thought about planning polo for your default Xfce fm for MX distro
& surprise other Xfce distro competitors don't you?
It builds fine with the Stretch gee and vte build-depends, and that is reproducible in pbuilder, but MX testers are reporting it can crash X back to the login screen if the Properties are closed or something like that. It may be a bug in the program or it might need newer versions of those, but I'll ask the testers to see if the deb from github does the same thing.

I'm not the dictator of MX, Jerry3904 is actually the project head. If Polo gets to the top on its merits, the developers will vote to use it over Thunar. Its extra features require a lot of extra dependencies. I'm too used to using Dolphin, myself...

Hey, though the rankings might have no meaning at all, MX has risen to #10 for the last six months at Distrowatch! Maybe we'll start getting some recognition on the Linux blogs, podcasts, and magazines instead of Ubuntu Ubuntu Mint Mint Solus Solus Elementary Elementary and so on. I was busy this AM trying a lot of package builds of Handbrake 1.1.0 for MX until I finally succeeded...no fair letting the build download stuff during the build from the Net like it wants to do, that's not kosher for Debian packages, so I adapted the deb-multimedia package so it wouldn't do it. :lol:

I already updated to the latest Selene in the MX test repo, and am going to tackle the current TimeShift next.
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
oswaldkelso
df -h | grep > 20TiB
df -h | grep > 20TiB
Posts: 1493
Joined: 2005-07-26 23:20
Location: UK
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 59 times

Re: Has anyone tried Polo File Manager?

#11 Post by oswaldkelso »

I looked at building a Dragora package, but to much work for me to just take a look.

I was also confused by the two different licenses. The COPYING file states " GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 3, 29 June 2007" but the licence.md file states "GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 3, 29 June 2007"

I guess I get to choose :lol:
Free Software Matters
Ash init durbatulûk, ash init gimbatul,
Ash init thrakatulûk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
My oldest used PC: 1999 imac 333Mhz 256MB PPC abandoned by Debian

Innovate
Posts: 188
Joined: 2015-12-27 01:28

Re: Has anyone tried Polo File Manager?

#12 Post by Innovate »

stevepusser wrote: It builds fine with the Stretch gee and vte build-depends, and that is reproducible in pbuilder, but MX testers are reporting it can crash X back to the login screen if the Properties are closed or something like that. It may be a bug in the program or it might need newer versions of those, but I'll ask the testers to see if the deb from github does the same thing.

I'm not the dictator of MX, Jerry3904 is actually the project head. If Polo gets to the top on its merits, the developers will vote to use it over Thunar. Its extra features require a lot of extra dependencies. I'm too used to using Dolphin, myself...

Hey, though the rankings might have no meaning at all, MX has risen to #10 for the last six months at Distrowatch! Maybe we'll start getting some recognition on the Linux blogs, podcasts, and magazines instead of Ubuntu Ubuntu Mint Mint Solus Solus Elementary Elementary and so on. I was busy this AM trying a lot of package builds of Handbrake 1.1.0 for MX until I finally succeeded...no fair letting the build download stuff during the build from the Net like it wants to do, that's not kosher for Debian packages, so I adapted the deb-multimedia package so it wouldn't do it. :lol:

I already updated to the latest Selene in the MX test repo, and am going to tackle the current TimeShift next.
Currently we've 3 or us on obs. You, me & Sunderland that active debian 9 packaging resources mostly.
I think I'll join share my research packaging with MX soon later for gratitude.
Since you've teach about using obs repo I owe your obs tutorials.

Btw, prepare to build "meson" it's need for build future GTK 3.27-4.0, future gnome & modern apps.
Many new gnome, gtk apps & modern apps they start to remove cmake, configure, autogen & shift to meson build
Which trouble us packagers on stretch. I stuck can't build new gnome apps yet because of meson build.
For example: gnome-disk-utility, file-roller, 3.26.0-3.28.0 they start to shift to meson
The Other one, you might need to upgrade is Wxwidgets 3.0.4 it's require for current latest build filezilla.

Post Reply