Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Flatpak problem
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 2018-06-11 05:57
Flatpak problem
I installed flatpak added repo but when i install a package this error pop-up. I'm internet connected.
-
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: 2015-08-30 20:14
Re: Flatpak problem
Use code tags and post only outputs of commands, screenshots are next to useless.
Like
Have you tried again? You also have the options of appimage, try that if flatpak doesn't work.
BTW, that KDE runtime is huge, 310+ MB...
Like
Code: Select all
this
BTW, that KDE runtime is huge, 310+ MB...
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 2018-06-11 05:57
Flatpak problem
Now I'm not able to try but I've tested android studio and the error has exactly the same output.
After downloading all delta parts, flatpak tells me that there is a connection problem.
After downloading all delta parts, flatpak tells me that there is a connection problem.
-
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: 2015-08-30 20:14
Re: Flatpak problem
Try using the latest version from stretch-backports. Uninstall your current flatpak, add stretch-backports repo, install flatpak from it and then try again.
https://backports.debian.org/Instructions/
There might be a problem with the old version, but I haven't tested it.
https://backports.debian.org/Instructions/
There might be a problem with the old version, but I haven't tested it.
-
- Emeritus
- Posts: 2435
- Joined: 2010-12-07 19:55
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
-
- Emeritus
- Posts: 2435
- Joined: 2010-12-07 19:55
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
- stevepusser
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 72 times
Re: Flatpak problem
My advice would be to resort to these bloated universal packages only if you exhaust the possiblity of a native backport...
https://repology.org/metapackage/keepassxc/versions
Hmm, Debian and thus MX 17 backports have fallen a couple releases behind. Let me see I I can update it for MX and my OBS backports. https://build.opensuse.org/package/show ... /keepassxc
https://repology.org/metapackage/keepassxc/versions
Hmm, Debian and thus MX 17 backports have fallen a couple releases behind. Let me see I I can update it for MX and my OBS backports. https://build.opensuse.org/package/show ... /keepassxc
MX Linux packager and developer
- stevepusser
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 72 times
Re: Flatpak problem
2.3.3 backports were successful for Jessie and Stretch on the OBS, and I'll see about adding Buster. A Debian Buster version or official backport will upgrade over mine if it ever comes down the pipe.
So it's your choice, a broken 300+ MB flatpak, or a few MB of backports done right.
So it's your choice, a broken 300+ MB flatpak, or a few MB of backports done right.
MX Linux packager and developer
Re: Flatpak problem
@stevepusser said it for me:arochester wrote:@golinux Specific evidence, please?
The way that's sold as "easy" to the clueless is often neither easy, efficient or reliable. And likely to have other undesirable, unadvertised "features" included.So it's your choice, a broken 300+ MB flatpak, or a few MB of backports done right.
May the FORK be with you!
- sunrat
- Administrator
- Posts: 6498
- Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Has thanked: 118 times
- Been thanked: 476 times
Re: Flatpak problem
Agreed. Why build packages that don't use available native libraries?golinux wrote:Flatpaks ARE the problem . . .
Just from a size aspect, I installed telegram-desktop from Debian repo yesterday. It used ~28MB of space. The equivalent flatpak is about 300MB!
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!
- Head_on_a_Stick
- Posts: 14114
- Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
- Location: London, England
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Re: Flatpak problem
I want the latest Blender version[1] for my Debian stable system but it won't backport and I'm not compiling it on an X201 but I do have the disk space to spare for a flatpak so it makes sense for mesunrat wrote:Why build packages that don't use available native libraries?
[1] They have a new principled BSDF for their Cycles renderer that emulates Disney's ubershader.
deadbang
Re: Flatpak problem
flatpaks (and whatever other container thingymajicks exist) are a problem if they create the illusion that they are easier and thus better than installing normal apps.
soon people will choose to install everything through flatpaks, and even the 1TB root partition is filled up in no time... not to speak of all the specific problems these containers bring with them.
especially if people don't even realise that what they install is something fundamentally different than if installing from the repos.
soon people will choose to install everything through flatpaks, and even the 1TB root partition is filled up in no time... not to speak of all the specific problems these containers bring with them.
especially if people don't even realise that what they install is something fundamentally different than if installing from the repos.
Re: Flatpak problem
debiman wrote:flatpaks (and whatever other container thingymajicks exist) are a problem if they create the illusion that they are easier and thus better than installing normal apps.
soon people will choose to install everything through flatpaks, and even the 1TB root partition is filled up in no time... not to speak of all the specific problems these containers bring with them.
especially if people don't even realise that what they install is something fundamentally different than if installing from the repos.
flatpak and Appimage are great (i dont like snap), There is not such a drama, they're around 250-450MB each application at first, until they start to sharing same frameworks, then they fill the same size as the regular application.
For example, flatpak is great for last video edition apps, they have most of them (kdenlive, pitivi, openshot, shotcut, avidemux, etc),, and they offer you last realised, and result that version is less buggy than what Stretch ships on. Ive seen it, kdenlive , others stretch apps crashing more often than flatpak's later versions.
Im already accepted flatpak as part of my system, Thanks to flatpak i dont see any need to use debian testing, when you can have available that last software now in debian stable.
bester69 wrote:STOP 2030 globalists demons, keep the fight for humanity freedom against NWO...