Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

Firefox 52 ESR End of Life

Graphical Environments, Managers, Multimedia & Desktop questions.
Message
Author
Wheelerof4te
Posts: 1454
Joined: 2015-08-30 20:14

Re: Firefox 52 ESR End of Life

#21 Post by Wheelerof4te »

bw123 wrote:All firefox extensions must be installed from mozilla thru the browser instead of from the repo with apt?
That's the gist of it. XUL package extensions don't work in Stable.

User avatar
None1975
df -h | participant
df -h | participant
Posts: 1404
Joined: 2015-11-29 18:23
Location: Russia, Kaliningrad
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 70 times

Re: Firefox 52 ESR End of Life

#22 Post by None1975 »

bw123 wrote:If you have time, can you explain a little better?
Yes, of course. I will try to explain.
bw123 wrote:Does xul-ext-noscript break with the upgrade?
Yes. This guy was simply inactive. It was written that the plugin is not supported and you need to look for an alternative. The NoScript plugin has been installed from the official Debian repository. I do not know why it did not recur and became incompatible with the new version of Firefox-esr. The version of Debian Stretch is 2.9.0.14-1, in Sid 5.1.7-1. Debian 10 does not have this extension at all. Maybe he's not stable enough, maybe something else ....so I did not fill the bug report.
bw123 wrote:What's web store?
It is addons for Firefox web site. Similar to Chrome Web Store.
bw123 wrote:I prefer stuff that complies with DFSG
I think that NoScript complies with DFSG and installing plugins from this web store is safe enough.
OS: Debian 12.4 Bookworm / DE: Enlightenment
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github

User avatar
bw123
Posts: 4015
Joined: 2011-05-09 06:02
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 28 times

Re: Firefox 52 ESR End of Life

#23 Post by bw123 »

...
I think that NoScript complies with DFSG and installing plugins from this web store is safe enough.
If all the addons there are DFSG compliant then I guess that will be fine with me. I'll do some checking on that. Thanks for the link, I did not find that site on a websearch for firefox web store.

According to this link, the AMO website is probably not something I'd be interested in. Doesn't look conforming to DFSG at all. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/doc ... cy/Reviews
Last edited by bw123 on 2018-09-08 15:43, edited 1 time in total.
resigned by AI ChatGPT

User avatar
None1975
df -h | participant
df -h | participant
Posts: 1404
Joined: 2015-11-29 18:23
Location: Russia, Kaliningrad
Has thanked: 46 times
Been thanked: 70 times

Re: Firefox 52 ESR End of Life

#24 Post by None1975 »

bw123 wrote:Thanks for the link,
You are welcome!
bw123 wrote:If all the addons there are DFSG compliant then I guess that will be fine with me. I'll do some checking on that.
I do not know about other extensions. Personally, I use only one-NoScript. As for NoScript, it is free and open source. For others, care should be taken.
OS: Debian 12.4 Bookworm / DE: Enlightenment
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github

milomak
Posts: 2168
Joined: 2009-06-09 22:20
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Firefox 52 ESR End of Life

#25 Post by milomak »

so tabmix plus seems to be the only extension that i can't get

but i seem to have been able to get the same functionality through other add-ons

edit - actually tab groups is really the one that i really hated losing
Desktop: A320M-A PRO MAX, AMD Ryzen 5 3600, GALAX GeForce RTX™ 2060 Super EX (1-Click OC) - Sid, Win10, Arch Linux, Gentoo, Solus
Laptop: hp 250 G8 i3 11th Gen - Sid
Kodi: AMD Athlon 5150 APU w/Radeon HD 8400 - Sid

Post Reply