That's the gist of it. XUL package extensions don't work in Stable.bw123 wrote:All firefox extensions must be installed from mozilla thru the browser instead of from the repo with apt?
Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Firefox 52 ESR End of Life
-
- Posts: 1454
- Joined: 2015-08-30 20:14
Re: Firefox 52 ESR End of Life
- None1975
- df -h | participant
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: 2015-11-29 18:23
- Location: Russia, Kaliningrad
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 70 times
Re: Firefox 52 ESR End of Life
Yes, of course. I will try to explain.bw123 wrote:If you have time, can you explain a little better?
Yes. This guy was simply inactive. It was written that the plugin is not supported and you need to look for an alternative. The NoScript plugin has been installed from the official Debian repository. I do not know why it did not recur and became incompatible with the new version of Firefox-esr. The version of Debian Stretch is 2.9.0.14-1, in Sid 5.1.7-1. Debian 10 does not have this extension at all. Maybe he's not stable enough, maybe something else ....so I did not fill the bug report.bw123 wrote:Does xul-ext-noscript break with the upgrade?
It is addons for Firefox web site. Similar to Chrome Web Store.bw123 wrote:What's web store?
I think that NoScript complies with DFSG and installing plugins from this web store is safe enough.bw123 wrote:I prefer stuff that complies with DFSG
OS: Debian 12.4 Bookworm / DE: Enlightenment
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github
Re: Firefox 52 ESR End of Life
If all the addons there are DFSG compliant then I guess that will be fine with me. I'll do some checking on that. Thanks for the link, I did not find that site on a websearch for firefox web store....
I think that NoScript complies with DFSG and installing plugins from this web store is safe enough.
According to this link, the AMO website is probably not something I'd be interested in. Doesn't look conforming to DFSG at all. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/doc ... cy/Reviews
Last edited by bw123 on 2018-09-08 15:43, edited 1 time in total.
resigned by AI ChatGPT
- None1975
- df -h | participant
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: 2015-11-29 18:23
- Location: Russia, Kaliningrad
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 70 times
Re: Firefox 52 ESR End of Life
You are welcome!bw123 wrote:Thanks for the link,
I do not know about other extensions. Personally, I use only one-NoScript. As for NoScript, it is free and open source. For others, care should be taken.bw123 wrote:If all the addons there are DFSG compliant then I guess that will be fine with me. I'll do some checking on that.
OS: Debian 12.4 Bookworm / DE: Enlightenment
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github
Re: Firefox 52 ESR End of Life
so tabmix plus seems to be the only extension that i can't get
but i seem to have been able to get the same functionality through other add-ons
edit - actually tab groups is really the one that i really hated losing
but i seem to have been able to get the same functionality through other add-ons
edit - actually tab groups is really the one that i really hated losing
Desktop: A320M-A PRO MAX, AMD Ryzen 5 3600, GALAX GeForce RTX™ 2060 Super EX (1-Click OC) - Sid, Win10, Arch Linux, Gentoo, Solus
Laptop: hp 250 G8 i3 11th Gen - Sid
Kodi: AMD Athlon 5150 APU w/Radeon HD 8400 - Sid
Laptop: hp 250 G8 i3 11th Gen - Sid
Kodi: AMD Athlon 5150 APU w/Radeon HD 8400 - Sid