Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

preferred firewall on debian buster

If none of the specific sub-forums seem right for your thread, ask here.
Post Reply
Message
Author
vryni
Posts: 58
Joined: 2017-06-16 05:12
Been thanked: 1 time

preferred firewall on debian buster

#1 Post by vryni »

When i installed debian 10 it came to my attention that
it comes with apparmor pre-installed.

Searching for "things to do after installing Debian 10"
i found this guide https://www.linuxtechi.com/things-to-do ... debian-10/
advocating the installation of ufw

Previously using Debian 9 (which came with ufw preinstalled by default)
i used to make some minimal, very basic changes to /etc/ufw/before.rules
telling myself that i was safe behind a firell
I am totally clueless with Apparmor

Should i invest time in learning to use Apparmor ?
or
should i install UFW and if so - do i have to uninstall Apparmor first ?

p.H
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 3049
Joined: 2017-09-17 07:12
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: preferred firewall on debian buster

#2 Post by p.H »

vryni wrote:Previously using Debian 9 (which came with ufw preinstalled by default)
AFAIK Debian 9 did not come with ufw preinstalled by default. Maybe some desktop environment did.

Apparmor is not a firewall, at least not in the common "packet filter" sense like iptables or nftables. It is a security framework which allows to restrict programs' capabilities (including network access).


User avatar
Head_on_a_Stick
Posts: 14114
Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
Location: London, England
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: preferred firewall on debian buster

#4 Post by Head_on_a_Stick »

vryni wrote:i used to make some minimal, very basic changes to /etc/ufw/before.rules
telling myself that i was safe behind a firell
Most desktop users don't really need a firewall and running one will not "protect" you in any meaningful way.

EDIT: apparmor does provide significant protections for the average desktop user though, which is why Debian has enabled it by default.
deadbang

Post Reply