I run league of legends and went smoothly. So I don't need new kernel and drivers, they are all including with bullseye?Head_on_a_Stick wrote:No, I missed the bit where you said you're running bullseye. That should support your hardware as long as the non-free firmware is installed.Kenshin Himura wrote:So i execute your commands?
The development branches are somewhat prone to breakage though, I wouldn't really recommend them for newcomers.
Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Can't install on native uefi
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: 2019-11-15 21:14
Re: Can't install on native uefi
- Head_on_a_Stick
- Posts: 14114
- Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
- Location: London, England
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Can't install on native uefi
That's right, yes. If your game runs smoothly then you must have the firmware as well.Kenshin Himura wrote:So I don't need new kernel and drivers, they are all including with bullseye?
Read this though: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debi ... .html#s3.1 ← note that testing is not one of the recommended branches.
deadbang
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: 2019-11-15 21:14
Re: Can't install on native uefi
I be done that, but I ve seen few people suggesting testing to those who wanted to be more update firmware at their PC's, because they were arguing with others who supported that debian is outdated and blah blah. But I don't understand why you and the other brother you suggest me to go into Arch, aren't we here to support Debian or Arch is also part of it and it's philosophy?Head_on_a_Stick wrote:That's right, yes. If your game runs smoothly then you must have the firmware as well.Kenshin Himura wrote:So I don't need new kernel and drivers, they are all including with bullseye?
Read this though: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debi ... .html#s3.1 ← note that testing is not one of the recommended branches.
Re: Can't install on native uefi
The problem is that your computer is newer than latest Debian stable. There are many arguments against using testing other than testing.
You can of course, it is your choice, but your mileage may vary.
Backports do help sometimes, also newer kernel perhaps, but then you lose security support.
Arch as rolling release would surely support your new hw better, I think that's why it was brought up.
You can of course, it is your choice, but your mileage may vary.
Backports do help sometimes, also newer kernel perhaps, but then you lose security support.
Arch as rolling release would surely support your new hw better, I think that's why it was brought up.
- Head_on_a_Stick
- Posts: 14114
- Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
- Location: London, England
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Can't install on native uefi
The firmware .deb packages from testing/unstable are actually "safe" to install in stable because they have no dependencies. But usually they're in the backports repository anyway.Kenshin Himura wrote:I ve seen few people suggesting testing to those who wanted to be more update firmware at their PC's
No, Arch are a bunch of non-free loving heathens but their distribution is actually designed as a rolling release whereas Debian testing/unstable are development branches and are only really supposed to be used by those interested in helping develop Debian. Breakage is expected.Kenshin Himura wrote:But I don't understand why you and the other brother you suggest me to go into Arch, aren't we here to support Debian or Arch is also part of it and it's philosophy?
deadbang
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: 2019-11-15 21:14
Re: Can't install on native uefi
So I stay with my beloved Debian. What do you mean breakage? Sorry I'm not native in englishHead_on_a_Stick wrote:The firmware .deb packages from testing/unstable are actually "safe" to install in stable because they have no dependencies. But usually they're in the backports repository anyway.Kenshin Himura wrote:I ve seen few people suggesting testing to those who wanted to be more update firmware at their PC's
No, Arch are a bunch of non-free loving heathens but their distribution is actually designed as a rolling release whereas Debian testing/unstable are development branches and are only really supposed to be used by those interested in helping develop Debian. Breakage is expected.Kenshin Himura wrote:But I don't understand why you and the other brother you suggest me to go into Arch, aren't we here to support Debian or Arch is also part of it and it's philosophy?
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: 2019-11-15 21:14
Re: Can't install on native uefi
Thanks for answeringarzgi wrote:The problem is that your computer is newer than latest Debian stable. There are many arguments against using testing other than testing.
You can of course, it is your choice, but your mileage may vary.
Backports do help sometimes, also newer kernel perhaps, but then you lose security support.
Arch as rolling release would surely support your new hw better, I think that's why it was brought up.
Re: Can't install on native uefi
Debian testing/unstable will get more frequent updates of packages, not just security updates like in stable. It could be a certain package is updated/upgraded, but still contain a bug. This could lead to problems with your current package and other ones if they require that specific package as a dependency ....Kenshin Himura wrote:What do you mean breakage? Sorry I'm not native in english
- Head_on_a_Stick
- Posts: 14114
- Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
- Location: London, England
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Can't install on native uefi
Parabola is probably the best choice for people who love open source and cutting edge hardware. I should start recommending that instead of Arch. Or Hyperbola. Not sure how they deal with wireless cards & µcode though
deadbang
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: 2019-11-15 21:14
- Head_on_a_Stick
- Posts: 14114
- Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
- Location: London, England
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
Re: Can't install on native uefi
Well try Debian stable with backports then, as I suggested originally.
deadbang
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: 2019-11-15 21:14
Re: Can't install on native uefi
I tried lxqt stable but after the first reboot when in try to enter I get screen shuttering and everything falls apart when I click on them, do you know why this happens?Head_on_a_Stick wrote:Well try Debian stable with backports then, as I suggested originally.
- Head_on_a_Stick
- Posts: 14114
- Joined: 2014-06-01 17:46
- Location: London, England
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: 2019-11-15 21:14
Re: Can't install on native uefi
How can I see that?Head_on_a_Stick wrote:No. What does the X.Org log say?