Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

Graphical Environments, Managers, Multimedia & Desktop questions.
Message
Author
User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#261 Post by stevepusser »

djk44883 wrote:
stevepusser wrote:I should be able to work on it some more starting around Saturday.
>For Debian 9.0 run the following as root:

Since Debian has released 10.x will you update the repository name?
The name is just "Multimedia Backports" as stevepassert's home OBS project, so I'm good there.

There are now various Debian releases in the repo, for the various ones newer that 9.0, you just substitute "10", "Testing", or "Unstable" for "9.0" in the instructions to add the repo and its key. Don't mix repos, of course--you still can't get a newer Krita on Stretch if you add my Buster repo, for example.
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#262 Post by stevepusser »

Added Fotowall 1.0 for Debian 9 on up.
Krita updated to 4.2.8.2 for Buster and Testing.
Strawberry updated to 0.6.7 for Debian 9 on up.
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#263 Post by stevepusser »

Qwinff 0.2.1+git20191128 (Qt-based GUI for FFMpeg transcoding) from Sid backported for Debian 8, 9, and 10, since the Buster version has a bug that prevents it from starting.
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
sunrat
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6412
Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Has thanked: 116 times
Been thanked: 462 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#264 Post by sunrat »

Just installed Strawberry from your repo in siduction. Seems to be working well, except for the analyser which wasn't working for me anyway in version 0.5.something which I had installed directly from their project page.
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ”
Remember to BACKUP!

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#265 Post by stevepusser »

ClipGrab browser video downloader updated to 3.8.7 for Debian Stretch through Sid. Stretch version have a bug where you'll have to copy and paste any URLs into the text entry box if you use ClipGrab in that way (I just let it grab them from the clipboard automatically)
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#266 Post by stevepusser »

Added Darktable 3.0.0 for Debian Buster, testing, and Sid.
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#267 Post by stevepusser »

Added latest MiniTube 3.3 for Buster, Testing, and Sid.
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#268 Post by stevepusser »

Strawberry getting updated to 0.6.8 for Debian Stretch through Sid--check here to make the builds are done:

https://build.opensuse.org/package/show ... strawberry
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
eor2004
Posts: 251
Joined: 2013-10-01 22:49
Location: Puerto Rico
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#269 Post by eor2004 »

Hi steve, do you have any packages for conky & conky manager like the one in MX repos for debian buster that I can safely install? Thanks in advance!
Debian 12 Gnome on a MSI H61M-P25 (B3) PC & on a Dell Latitude E6410 & HP EliteBook 8540p Laptops.
LMDE 6 on a Panasonic ToughBook CF-C1 Laptop.
Bodhi Linux 7 on a HP Compaq DC5750 Small Form Factor PC.
Windows 11 on a Intel DH55TC PC.

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#270 Post by stevepusser »

You should be able to install the MX packages for those on the matching version of Debian...MX 17/18=Stretch, MX 19= Buster.
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
eor2004
Posts: 251
Joined: 2013-10-01 22:49
Location: Puerto Rico
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#271 Post by eor2004 »

I used the link in your signature to get to MX repo & Packages for MX-19, there are 3 packages for conky, should I install all these 3 packages?

conky-toggle-mx_19.11_all.deb
conky-manager-dbgsym_2.4+dfsg1-2mx19+1_amd64.deb
conky-manager_2.4+dfsg1-2mx19+1_amd64.deb
Debian 12 Gnome on a MSI H61M-P25 (B3) PC & on a Dell Latitude E6410 & HP EliteBook 8540p Laptops.
LMDE 6 on a Panasonic ToughBook CF-C1 Laptop.
Bodhi Linux 7 on a HP Compaq DC5750 Small Form Factor PC.
Windows 11 on a Intel DH55TC PC.

User avatar
sunrat
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6412
Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Has thanked: 116 times
Been thanked: 462 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#272 Post by sunrat »

You don't need the dbgsym one, that's for debugging. And conky-toggle-mx just enables you to switch Conky on and off.
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ”
Remember to BACKUP!

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#273 Post by stevepusser »

The MX version of conky-manager is a dfsg-safe rebuild (Debian Free Software Guidelines) where the built-in conky themes have been removed, mostly because they included non-free or even pirated fonts along with the theme, or we could not determine what license applied at all. We replaced those with mx-conky and mx-conky-data, which provides themes that we could feel safe redistributing.

You might still be able to find .7z theme packs for Conky Manager 2 out on the Net that you can load into it--it's been a while since I looked for them.

http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/pool/main/m/mx-conky/
http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/pool/main/m/mx-conky-data/
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#274 Post by stevepusser »

I noticed that Youtube's recent changes to their API borked VLC's ability to play Youtube URLs, but if you save this page https://git.videolan.org/?p=vlc.git;a=b ... ua;hb=HEAD

as "youtube.luac", then copy it over VLC's existing youtube.luac file, it fixes it. For my 64-bit system, the file lives in

/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/vlc/lua/playlist/youtube.luac

but you'll have to change that if you run a different architecture. For MX Linux, since we build our own version of VLC to make sure va-api keeps working, I pushed new rebuilds with that file change patched in.
MX Linux packager and developer

mileys1990
Posts: 1
Joined: 2020-02-04 07:07

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#275 Post by mileys1990 »

Thank you. Finally got things sorted out. Must be having a couple of 'off' days. <sigh>

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#276 Post by stevepusser »

Kodi 18.5, backported from Experimental, added for Buster through Sid:

https://build.opensuse.org/package/show ... /kodi-18.X

It suggests the spectrum visualization addon, but that doesn't seem to work. Debian has version 1.1 of that, but the matching version for Kodia 18 Leia is 3.0.3. I'll see if I can build that and get it to work.

https://github.com/xbmc/visualization.spectrum/releases
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#277 Post by stevepusser »

Turns out that the present Kodi packages have a bug--no subtitles available--because it needs to be built with a newer fontforge-nox than Buster has, and the control file didn't note that . I worked around yet another bug backporting fontforge on the OBS, and updated Kodi packages should be done in an hour or two.
MX Linux packager and developer

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#278 Post by stevepusser »

Added Blender 2.8.2 sources for a Buster backport a couple of hours ago, and the amd64 build died a step from the finish line when it ran out of disk space allotted to the build VM. The arm64 build succeeded, so I bumped the disk up to 40 GB and restarted the builds.

Added GIMP 2.10.18 sources for a Buster build, along with some of its newer required libspiro, babl, gegl, and meson ports. That should be finishing up shortly.
MX Linux packager and developer

pendrachken
Posts: 1394
Joined: 2007-03-04 21:10
Location: U.S.A. - WI.

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#279 Post by pendrachken »

Heya Steve, not a high priority or anything, but can you try to finesse building the shadow source package into installable .debs? I know some of the things will conflict with util-linux ( like the su binary ) but would prefer particularly su over the util-linux version. Either by direct replacement, or preferably using the debian-alterantives system.

I know the shadow source package builds fairly easily as I tested it using the old make && make install method in one of my disposable VMs. I would like a proper version installed through the package manager though, and didn't really get anywhere with debuild, even with the already debianized source available through the buster source repo.
fortune -o
Your love life will be... interesting.
:twisted: How did it know?

The U.S. uses the metric system too, we have tenths, hundredths and thousandths of inches :-P

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 71 times

Re: Hah! Who needs PPAs? I have my own multimedia+ repo!

#280 Post by stevepusser »

I'm sorry, but I have no idea what the "shadow" source package is. :(

In other news, I have updated the Blender for Buster to 2.8.2a, which is a bugfix build, and it's building atm.

Re: conky-manager in MX, we have an updated version in the test repo that claims to support the newer 1.10 conky themes out of the box...

I've also backported Mypaint 2.0.0 for both Buster and Stretch bases for MX, but don't have the time to make and upload OBS sources today.
MX Linux packager and developer

Post Reply