Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Yes it should be feasible. Nothing alarming to me.
But if you want jessie and stretch at the same time, it is difficult for me.
You are going to loose time with old installation mixtures.
You need something fresh.
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/estmob-sendanywhere.list
deb http://update.send-anywhere.com/linux/debian/ stable main
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/google-chrome.list
deb [arch=amd64] http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/skype-stable.list
deb [arch=amd64] https://repo.skype.com/deb stable main
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/google.list
deb [arch=amd64] http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main
/etc/apt/sources.list
no my brother is not involved in what i am doing with this debian he just reminded me that I have debian jessie not stretch . that's all he said or did about my debian . he is not responsible at all .
this is how it looks now which i have commented the entries . at the time of upgrade which ruined up my debian only line 2 had no comment , that was the only thing active .
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch-updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stretch/updates main contrib non-free
this is all a misunderstanding . this is as I mentioned in my first post some new repositories that I added and did apt-get update and got some errors(which i presented in my first post) and didn't do any upgrade with them after that I deleted them ( I didn't do any upgrade with them) . the only important line in my source list was the this one
deb http://debian.drdteam.org/ stable multivers
[/code]
which when i upgraded was active . the others were commented out . I have debian jessie . in the first place I have installed debian jessie , I made a mistake i thought i have stretch but its supposed to be jessie . 4 years ago there were no stretch . problem is when i run the command
cat /etc/debian_version I get 9.11 which is stretch , now I assume that since I am having some problems on my debian , the upgrade which i did based on this source(deb http://debian.drdteam.org/ stable multivers) has tried to upgrade my system to stretch . thats why everything is mixed up . my main question was is it possible to add the correct repositories and do the upgrade again to fix my debian . I hope you understand what has happened .
rezapanda wrote:I hope you understand what has happened .
No I don't and don't want and don't care what you or your sister did 4 years ago.
What's this line, with a mistake in multiverse: "deb http://debian.drdteam.org/ stable multivers"
And where did you find this "debian.drdteam.org/" ? Which documentation did you use 4 years ago ?
Try this sources.list / the one you had few hours ago / I can prove it.
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch-updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stretch/updates main contrib non-free
Make your best, but without me. You need a specialist.
And... keep in mind: clean and fresh Buster.
rezapanda wrote:I hope you understand what has happened .
No I don't and don't want and don't care what you or your sister did 4 years ago.
What is this line, with a mistake in multiverse: "deb http://debian.drdteam.org/ stable multivers"
And where did you find this "debian.drdteam.org/" ? Which documentation did you use 4 years ago ?
Try this sources.list / the one you had few hours ago / I can prove it.
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch-updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stretch/updates main contrib non-free
Make your best, but without me. You need a specialist.
And... keep in mind: clean and fresh Buster.
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.2.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 xfce-CD Binary-1 20191116-09:57]/ buster main
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.2.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 xfce-CD Binary-1 20191116-09:57]/ buster main
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster main
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main
# buster-updates, previously known as 'volatile'
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster-updates main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster-updates main
# This system was installed using small removable media
# (e.g. netinst, live or single CD). The matching "deb cdrom"
# entries were disabled at the end of the installation process.
# For information about how to configure apt package sources,
# see the sources.list(5) manual.
I read in a website that I should change the repositories to something like this :
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster main contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main contrib non-free
what do you suggest ? is getting packages from non-free and contrib sources safe ? for example for installing my wifi driver I was recommended my the installer to get them from the non-free sources . let me know thanks
Great.
If I tell you to keep it as it is, I know someone else will tell you to remove either debian-security or buster-updates.
If one has to removed, why Debian adds both is a mystery / I am not so much interested in these discussions.
Minor level discussion.
What you can do is to comment all lines starting by deb-src
The buster-updates repository contains useful bug-fixes and is distinct from the Debian Security repositories. All three sets should be present in /etc/apt/sources.list
rezapanda wrote:I read in a website that I should change the repositories to something like this
And if that website told you to stick your hand in a fire would you do that?
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stretch/updates main
deb http://security.debian.org/stretch/updates main contrib non-free
Head_on_a_Stick wrote:Why have you listed the Security repositories twice ?
+ I did not say to remove any repository in the sources.list created by Debian, but say preferably keep it as it is.
Maybe I even remember some comments from ...yourself....
Head_on_a_Stick wrote:
And if that website told you to stick your hand in a fire would you do that?
yeah considering your advice from yesterday, thats why i didn't do it and thought I better ask you for advice . the thing is just that debian doc is a sea of information , and I just don't know where to look .