I already told you, I looked at the differences and decided for myself that making the change wasn't worth the trouble for my particular use case. I'm not sure why you're taking that so personally.LE_746F6D617A7A69 wrote:So what is Your claim? - I just can't wait to see the final version ...Mr. Lumbergh wrote:Read what I wrote. I never did make that claim, just I'd rather not add the overhead if I don't have to.
Can You define/measure that mysterious "overhead"?
What is the exact problem that You have with the BTRFS? (or any other FS?) , especially with a reference to a Debian stable? Please share Your experience, but please not to forget to include a real-time measurements of the dalays ... if You have any ...
If you're still curious about the slower write times (what I referred to as overhead), I'll refer you back to the benchmark.
And no, I don't have anything against the filesytem. It's just a tool, and one I already noted would facilitate backups quite well.