Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
sudo journalctl
- Journal begins at Wed 2021-08-18 23:37:50 EDT, ends at Tue 2021-09-07 20:11:17 EDT. --
Aug 18 23:37:50 rosewill kernel: Linux version 5.10.0-8-amd64 (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc-10 (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2) #1 SMP Debian 5.10.46-4 (2021-0>
Aug 18 23:37:50 rosewill kernel: Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.10.0-8-amd64 root=UUID=f49ee6f5-0009-4faa-a974-3a580de2163e ro quiet
uname -a
Linux rosewill 5.10.0-8-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.46-4 (2021-08-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux
It looks like system A is indeed running the 5.10 kernel but why is journalctl reporting old versions of the kernel and gcc on that first line and why does it say the boot_image is 4.19?
Last edited by road hazard on 2021-09-08 21:32, edited 1 time in total.
....and those line up with system B. I'm sure this is a nothing burger but the small OCD part of me is wondering if this can be fixed (not that there's anything wrong I guess?!)
Aki wrote: ↑2021-09-08 07:43
The journal entry with kernel 4.19 could be related to the boot before the upgrade from Debian Buster to Debian Bullseye.
Of course it is. At least before the kernel was upgraded. The journal entry is dated back to last month.
DING DING DING!
Wow, aren't I the dumb n00b. I checked further into the journal and do indeed see the updated kernel info for system A. What threw me is I updated both of these systems on the same day to Debian 11 so it was confusing why one showed the newer kernel info at the beginning and the other didn't. But all is well, thanks for helping!