Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

Debian Installer Boots to Kernel instead of Calamares

Ask for help with issues regarding the Installations of the Debian O/S.
Post Reply
Message
Author
crimsonpython24
Posts: 5
Joined: 2021-05-09 17:11

Debian Installer Boots to Kernel instead of Calamares

#1 Post by crimsonpython24 »

Hello all,

I've been running into a problem with Debian's calamares installer. More specifically, I can't load it despite having the live iso.

I downloaded the image from this source (https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/cu ... so-hybrid/)-- please correct me if I used the incorrect ones -- and selected the first choice, as selected in the image below. However, Debian threw me a command line-like interface instead of the installer similar to that of Ubuntu.

Image

I am using a Thinkpad running Windows 10. I burned the ISO image to a USB stick using Rufus and booted from it.

This problem has literally stopped me from trying Debian for months. Can anyone please help?

Thanks in advance.

User avatar
dilberts_left_nut
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 5346
Joined: 2009-10-05 07:54
Location: enzed
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 66 times

Re: Debian Installer Boots to Kernel instead of Calamares

#2 Post by dilberts_left_nut »

Which one did you download?
AdrianTM wrote:There's no hacker in my grandma...

arochester
Emeritus
Emeritus
Posts: 2435
Joined: 2010-12-07 19:55
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 54 times

Re: Debian Installer Boots to Kernel instead of Calamares

#3 Post by arochester »

Which one did you download from that page? Cinnamon? There are many.
Debian threw me a command line-like interface
What EXACTLY was that? What did you see?

crimsonpython24
Posts: 5
Joined: 2021-05-09 17:11

Re: Debian Installer Boots to Kernel instead of Calamares

#4 Post by crimsonpython24 »

dilberts_left_nut wrote:Which one did you download?
debian-live-10.9.0-amd64-kde.iso
arochester wrote:What EXACTLY was that? What did you see?
Image
Image
Image

Not the new calamares UI that was promised (the boot halted in the third image)

User avatar
4D696B65
Site admin
Site admin
Posts: 2696
Joined: 2009-06-28 06:09
Been thanked: 86 times

Re: Debian Installer Boots to Kernel instead of Calamares

#5 Post by 4D696B65 »

The last pic shows the base system waiting for you to log in. The firmware error will be solved by installing firmware-iwlwifi. The main issue is why x didn't start. What hardware do you have? lspci lsusb

crimsonpython24
Posts: 5
Joined: 2021-05-09 17:11

Re: Debian Installer Boots to Kernel instead of Calamares

#6 Post by crimsonpython24 »

4D696B65 wrote:The last pic shows the base system waiting for you to log in. The firmware error will be solved by installing firmware-iwlwifi. The main issue is why x didn't start. What hardware do you have? lspci lsusb
How should I install the firmware that you mentioned?

I am running Windows 10 on a Thinkpad. I will post the photos for the commands real quick.


User avatar
4D696B65
Site admin
Site admin
Posts: 2696
Joined: 2009-06-28 06:09
Been thanked: 86 times

Re: Debian Installer Boots to Kernel instead of Calamares

#8 Post by 4D696B65 »

If lspci is not found, your system is somehow borked. Since this is a new install with no investment, I would reinstall with a Bullseye non-free image

https://cdimage.debian.org/images/unoff ... -firmware/

crimsonpython24
Posts: 5
Joined: 2021-05-09 17:11

Re: Debian Installer Boots to Kernel instead of Calamares

#9 Post by crimsonpython24 »

So I should download images from

https://cdimage.debian.org/images/unoff ... e+nonfree/

If I want the calamares installer?

User avatar
stevepusser
Posts: 12930
Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 72 times

Re: Debian Installer Boots to Kernel instead of Calamares

#10 Post by stevepusser »

You entered "lspcl" instead of "lspci"...(el ess pee sea eye)
MX Linux packager and developer

Post Reply