Hi,
I asked this over at Launchpad Answers, but was directed here because it was an upstream change.
The removal's commit message cites it as solving a bug, but the bug has little to do with that program's presence in Debian: util-linux: rename.ul is not installed as a possible alternative for the "rename" command. I understand why rename.ul was made unavailable in update-alternatives, and I agree, it's not a compatible interface, but I don't see how the logical conclusion of that is to simply drop it. Couldn't the bug have been closed as a wontfix without the commit? The suffix already differentiates it from the standard rename so it does not create a conflict. Its man page explains its usage, which is clearly different from Perl's rename. The old version has been around for a long time; I don't see what benefits this BC-breaking change confers. Tab-completing "rena" in a shell now provides nothing at all.
Maybe there was more discussion on this and I just couldn't find it.
Regards.
Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230
Removal of rename.ul from util-linux package
- sunrat
- Administrator
- Posts: 6476
- Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Has thanked: 118 times
- Been thanked: 474 times
Re: Removal of rename.ul from util-linux package
Maybe on a developer mailing list somewhere. This is a mere user forum, precious few devs here.
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!