Scheduled Maintenance: We are aware of an issue with Google, AOL, and Yahoo services as email providers which are blocking new registrations. We are trying to fix the issue and we have several internal and external support tickets in process to resolve the issue. Please see: viewtopic.php?t=158230

 

 

 

[Suggestion] Ya know what would be really cool?

Code of conduct, suggestions, and information on forums.debian.net.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
kent_dorfman766
Posts: 540
Joined: 2022-12-16 06:34
Location: socialist states of america
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 70 times

[Suggestion] Ya know what would be really cool?

#1 Post by kent_dorfman766 »

If we could get rid of that "we use cookies" popup without opening up our browsers to cookies that last across browsing sessions. I mean, the sophisticated web lurker understands that most sites use cookies, and they also generally choose to disable persistence of cookies across sessions...and exceptions for domains sets a bad precedent. It says the behaviour is OK.

The repetition of the popup on login has become kind of annoying. :?

User avatar
sunrat
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6511
Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Has thanked: 119 times
Been thanked: 489 times

Re: [Suggestion] Ya know what would be really cool?

#2 Post by sunrat »

Install "I don't care about cookies" add-on. It blocks that popup from almost every site.
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ”
Remember to BACKUP!

steve_v
df -h | grep > 20TiB
df -h | grep > 20TiB
Posts: 1418
Joined: 2012-10-06 05:31
Location: /dev/chair
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 191 times

Re: [Suggestion] Ya know what would be really cool?

#3 Post by steve_v »

I just use ublock to nuke the popup. Screw your cookies, and screw your cookie prompt as well. Works with a wide range of other, similarly obnoxious things too. :)
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.

User avatar
kent_dorfman766
Posts: 540
Joined: 2022-12-16 06:34
Location: socialist states of america
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 70 times

Re: [Suggestion] Ya know what would be really cool?

#4 Post by kent_dorfman766 »

Difference of philosophies here. I'm not really into adding another layer to remove something that IMHO, is kind of frivolous in the first place. and then can I "trust" the add-on? I don't see the source on the devs webpage...That's just as bad as trusting cellphone apps.

User avatar
kent_dorfman766
Posts: 540
Joined: 2022-12-16 06:34
Location: socialist states of america
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 70 times

Re: [Suggestion] Ya know what would be really cool?

#5 Post by kent_dorfman766 »

looks like ublock has source on github. Will check it out, but it is still the less preferable route...thanks!

steve_v
df -h | grep > 20TiB
df -h | grep > 20TiB
Posts: 1418
Joined: 2012-10-06 05:31
Location: /dev/chair
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 191 times

Re: [Suggestion] Ya know what would be really cool?

#6 Post by steve_v »

kent_dorfman766 wrote: 2023-06-16 00:17I don't see the source on the devs webpage...
On that, as if you need another reason not to trust it, "I don't care about cookies" was recently aquired by Avast. :lol:
There's a fork though: https://github.com/OhMyGuus/I-Still-Don ... ut-Cookies

As for UBO, if you subscribe "Fanboy's Annoyance List", you don't even need to explicitly block the cookie prompt here, it's included. :D

Code: Select all

Filter ##div.cookie-notice
Filter list Fanboy's Annoyance List
Context forums.debian.net
Otherwise, "Element zapper mode"... click... *foof* annoying thing goes away. :P
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.

User avatar
kent_dorfman766
Posts: 540
Joined: 2022-12-16 06:34
Location: socialist states of america
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 70 times

Re: [Suggestion] Ya know what would be really cool?

#7 Post by kent_dorfman766 »

steve_v wrote: 2023-06-16 00:25
kent_dorfman766 wrote: 2023-06-16 00:17I don't see the source on the devs webpage...
On that, as if you need another reason not to trust it, "I don't care about cookies" was recently aquired by Avast. :lol:
There's a fork though: https://github.com/OhMyGuus/I-Still-Don ... ut-Cookies

As for UBO, if you subscribe "Fanboy's Annoyance List", you don't even need to explicitly block the cookie prompt here, it's included. :D

Code: Select all

Filter ##div.cookie-notice
Filter list Fanboy's Annoyance List
Context forums.debian.net
Otherwise, "Element zapper mode"... click... *foof* annoying thing goes away. :P
I noticed the github page for UBO. building it from source is on my todo list now. Thanks!

The crap we have to go thru to even attempt some degree of safety. Jebus!

steve_v
df -h | grep > 20TiB
df -h | grep > 20TiB
Posts: 1418
Joined: 2012-10-06 05:31
Location: /dev/chair
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 191 times

Re: [Suggestion] Ya know what would be really cool?

#8 Post by steve_v »

kent_dorfman766 wrote: 2023-06-16 02:12building it from source is on my todo list now.
One could always run Gentoo... Compiling from source is the default installation method over here :mrgreen:

On content blockers in general, even without building from source I'd still consider ublock (or equivalent) a lesser evil than allowing any old website to do whatever it wants on your machine. The modern 'net is a right hive of scum and villany (most of whom wear suits), and frankly I can't stand even a few minutes of it without at least basic adblocking and javascript filtering.
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.

Post Reply