[Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
I would like Hypnotix (I know it from Linux Mint Cinnamon).
Ich fänd Hypnotix gut (kenne ich aus Linux Mint Cinnamon).
https://github.com/linuxmint/hypnotix
Ich fänd Hypnotix gut (kenne ich aus Linux Mint Cinnamon).
https://github.com/linuxmint/hypnotix
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: 2018-06-20 15:16
- Location: Colorado
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 272 times
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/aweather
I do have it working on a i686 12.7, kind of... I don't know enough to fix it completely...
It would be nice if the repo versions of gnutv and handbrake actually worked.
I do have it working on a i686 12.7, kind of... I don't know enough to fix it completely...
It would be nice if the repo versions of gnutv and handbrake actually worked.
Mottainai
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
For me it's
- uMatrix ( webext-umatrix-firefox ) - the loss of development on uMatrix upstream is mourned. We are going on almost four years since the last update
- Tagaini Jisho ( tagainijisho ) - I've had to build it from source since I use it almost daily.
- Mullvad Browser ( and other FF derivatives ) - Would be a nice option to have instead of meticulously sanitizing Firefox-ESR at the user.js
- YaCy - YaCy search had supposedly at one time been packaged in Debian but today requires a 3rd party repo or manual installation.
- Xonotic - Would be good to replace Nexuiz which is AFAIK a dead project.
- Pauker ( pauker ) - Not a huge loss, though.
- wizard10000
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1176
- Joined: 2019-04-16 23:15
- Location: southeastern us
- Has thanked: 122 times
- Been thanked: 206 times
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
qjournalctl. Graphical journal viewer/searcher - I steal it from MX repos because that's the only place I've found it packaged as a .deb
we see things not as they are, but as we are.
-- anais nin
-- anais nin
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
A piece of abandon ware
https://sourceforge.net/projects/easymp3gain/
Ideally there would be a KDE/qt version
https://sourceforge.net/projects/easymp3gain/
Ideally there would be a KDE/qt version
It's Nice How Free From the Restraints of Reality You Are...
- wizard10000
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1176
- Joined: 2019-04-16 23:15
- Location: southeastern us
- Has thanked: 122 times
- Been thanked: 206 times
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
I replaced it with an alias - but this one adds a 2db boost because my car plays mp3s about 2db lower than radio broadcasts.Garthhh wrote: 2024-11-05 18:21A piece of abandon ware
https://sourceforge.net/projects/easymp3gain/
Ideally there would be a KDE/qt version
Code: Select all
alias normalize='find . -name "*.mp3" -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 -P 4 mp3gain -r -s r -d 2.0'
we see things not as they are, but as we are.
-- anais nin
-- anais nin
- Hallvor
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: 2009-04-16 18:35
- Location: Kristiansand, Norway
- Has thanked: 170 times
- Been thanked: 231 times
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
Amarok
[HowTo] Install and configure Debian bookworm
Debian 12 | KDE Plasma | ThinkPad T440s | 4 × Intel® Core™ i7-4600U CPU @ 2.10GHz | 12 GiB RAM | Mesa Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | 1 TB SSD
Debian 12 | KDE Plasma | ThinkPad T440s | 4 × Intel® Core™ i7-4600U CPU @ 2.10GHz | 12 GiB RAM | Mesa Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | 1 TB SSD
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
Thanks for the replies
The last time I tried Amarok it would freeze for long periods
I remember struggling with building smart playlists, got bored went back to the fork Clementine/Strawberry
Will Amarok let me adjust levels on flash drives not just the entire library?
Wizard 10000
Thanks for the code, but it's over my head [skill level], hence the need for a GUI
I found this
https://github.com/complexlogic/rsgain#usage
I never could get it to work
The last time I tried Amarok it would freeze for long periods
I remember struggling with building smart playlists, got bored went back to the fork Clementine/Strawberry
Will Amarok let me adjust levels on flash drives not just the entire library?
Wizard 10000
Thanks for the code, but it's over my head [skill level], hence the need for a GUI
I found this
https://github.com/complexlogic/rsgain#usage
I never could get it to work
It's Nice How Free From the Restraints of Reality You Are...
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
The Perl bindings for programming QT. Programming Gtk3 works like a charm, "batteries included" in every bookworm installation, but I'd like to learm programming with QT as well. Learning the Python language to do so is by far no choice for me.
- bbbhltz
- Section Moderator
- Posts: 359
- Joined: 2024-01-10 14:53
- Location: Normandy
- XMMP/Jabber: bbbhltz@mailbox.org
- Has thanked: 73 times
- Been thanked: 83 times
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
I sometimes use fre:ac (https://www.freac.org/), I don't think it is in the repos.
gramma (https://caderek.github.io/gramma/).
gramma (https://caderek.github.io/gramma/).
bbbhltz
longtime desktop Linux user; eternal newbie
longtime desktop Linux user; eternal newbie
- stevepusser
- Posts: 13098
- Joined: 2009-10-06 05:53
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 99 times
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
You can also get easygain from the MX repo. Triple your money back if not happy with it.Garthhh wrote: 2024-11-05 18:21 A piece of abandon ware
https://sourceforge.net/projects/easymp3gain/
Ideally there would be a KDE/qt version
Modesty forbids me from saying who packaged it.
https://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/pool/main/e/easymp3gain/
MX Linux packager and developer
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: 2023-12-08 16:48
- Location: Seattle,Wa USA
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
I'd really like to see the net-tools package be reinstated as I'm used to using utilities such as ifconfig,dig and others.
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
You probably already know, but dig is currently packaged with dnsutils.friendlysalmon88 wrote: 2024-11-08 21:58 I'd really like to see the net-tools package be reinstated as I'm used to using utilities such as ifconfig,dig and others.
- Aristocat
- Discord Affiliate
- Posts: 12
- Joined: 2024-06-24 10:46
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
I have found Strawberry to be the best replacement for Amarok and it does have stable development. Funnily enough, I wasn't into Clementine back in the day when it was being developed.
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
I keep seeing that Clementine isn't being developed
Which is because it's done, mature, just bug & security updates...
Strawberry is very similar, I can't think of a feature it has that Clem doesn't
When I was on Manjaro, Clem was on aur & might be broken for a few days if I updated right when they came out instead of waiting a few days, so I used Strawberry which was in the repository
Here on Debian, Clem is in the repo...
In order to be able to use any player, I set up my files to use the comment field for rating as it is included in the meta data, unlike rating, same for playlists
Group is handy too, but isn't respected by the meta data editor I use Easytag
Which is because it's done, mature, just bug & security updates...
Strawberry is very similar, I can't think of a feature it has that Clem doesn't
When I was on Manjaro, Clem was on aur & might be broken for a few days if I updated right when they came out instead of waiting a few days, so I used Strawberry which was in the repository
Here on Debian, Clem is in the repo...
In order to be able to use any player, I set up my files to use the comment field for rating as it is included in the meta data, unlike rating, same for playlists
Group is handy too, but isn't respected by the meta data editor I use Easytag
It's Nice How Free From the Restraints of Reality You Are...
- Hallvor
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: 2009-04-16 18:35
- Location: Kristiansand, Norway
- Has thanked: 170 times
- Been thanked: 231 times
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
I tried to like Strawberry, but I couldn't. Amarok is coming back, though:
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=amarok
Edit: If you run stable and can stand Flatpaks: https://flathub.org/apps/org.kde.amarok
[HowTo] Install and configure Debian bookworm
Debian 12 | KDE Plasma | ThinkPad T440s | 4 × Intel® Core™ i7-4600U CPU @ 2.10GHz | 12 GiB RAM | Mesa Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | 1 TB SSD
Debian 12 | KDE Plasma | ThinkPad T440s | 4 × Intel® Core™ i7-4600U CPU @ 2.10GHz | 12 GiB RAM | Mesa Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | 1 TB SSD
- sunrat
- Site admin
- Posts: 7451
- Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Has thanked: 134 times
- Been thanked: 665 times
Re: [Discussion] Software that you wish were in the Debian repositories
Amarok was my favourite and I hope it comes back strong. Now I mainly use DeadBeef which isn't in the repo but installs easily from .deb file from their site, or MX also maintain it in MX repo.
Cantata is an excellent MPD frontend with database and smart playlists like Amarok, and is in the repo. For single file plays, MPV.
So software I wish was in the repo - DeadBeef.
Thumbnail:
DistroTube review:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OVzTQaFIfY
Cantata is an excellent MPD frontend with database and smart playlists like Amarok, and is in the repo. For single file plays, MPV.
So software I wish was in the repo - DeadBeef.
Thumbnail:
DistroTube review:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OVzTQaFIfY
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!