Why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 2024-11-10 16:12
- Has thanked: 1 time
Why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
Hello
I use Ubuntu and Fedora, normally to install them, exists two .iso files, it such as for Desktop/Workstation and Server respectively
I installed through VirtualBox Debian in peace. It thanks to some tutorials in YouTube, even when the procedure is straight, just in case I did do a research
It is my first time with this distribution.
I've confirmed that if I want install Debian as server, in the page about "desktop environment" must be:
* unchecked the "Debian desktop environment" and "... Gnome" checkboxes
* check the "SSH server" checkbox
* keep checked the "standard system utilities" checkbox
So my question is, why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
Thanks for your understanding
I use Ubuntu and Fedora, normally to install them, exists two .iso files, it such as for Desktop/Workstation and Server respectively
I installed through VirtualBox Debian in peace. It thanks to some tutorials in YouTube, even when the procedure is straight, just in case I did do a research
It is my first time with this distribution.
I've confirmed that if I want install Debian as server, in the page about "desktop environment" must be:
* unchecked the "Debian desktop environment" and "... Gnome" checkboxes
* check the "SSH server" checkbox
* keep checked the "standard system utilities" checkbox
So my question is, why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
Thanks for your understanding
- wizard10000
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1084
- Joined: 2019-04-16 23:15
- Location: southeastern us
- Has thanked: 117 times
- Been thanked: 189 times
Re: Why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
Just my opinion but I'd imagine folks who want a CLI-only server can uncheck a couple of boxes to get one. Maintaining install images requires developer resources and I personally think that those resources could be put to better use.
we see things not as they are, but as we are.
-- anais nin
-- anais nin
Re: Why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
If you define "server" as a computer with no gui, and a "desktop" as a computer system with a gui, then it makes sense to package/name your distributions accordingly. So I guess that's where Fedora and Ubuntu are coming from. Personally I don't buy it.
I define a server as a computer that provides services to users, i.e., services such as web application server, database server, file server, etc. Whether or not a given server has a gui is of little-to-no consequence. (BTW, Microsoft has sold a bazillion copies of Windows Server, and it comes with a gui.)
I define a server as a computer that provides services to users, i.e., services such as web application server, database server, file server, etc. Whether or not a given server has a gui is of little-to-no consequence. (BTW, Microsoft has sold a bazillion copies of Windows Server, and it comes with a gui.)
Re: Why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
It is, in part, Debian living up to its aim to be a universal operating system. The installation media as-is does an excellent job offering choice and user agency to deploy a wide range of configurations with only a few options screens and toggles. It leaves me wondering why other distributions expend the effort to build nearly identical but superficially different images.
- sunrat
- Site admin
- Posts: 7365
- Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Has thanked: 133 times
- Been thanked: 649 times
Re: Why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
I would hope people installing a server might know what they want and not be forced to some pre-configured setup. Do you want apache or nginx? lighttpd, node.js? mariadb or something else?
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ” Remember to BACKUP!
- donald
- Debian Developer, Site Admin
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: 2021-03-30 20:08
- Has thanked: 242 times
- Been thanked: 296 times
Re: Why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
Doesnt the installer ask which packages you wish to install at installation time? Desktop Managers, Apache, SSH, etc ... ? I did one last week but am so used to seeing the screen that I've never paid actual attention to it.
Typo perfectionish.
"The advice given above is all good, and just because a new message has appeared it does not mean that a problem has arisen, just that a new gremlin hiding in the hardware has been exposed." - FreewheelinFrank
"The advice given above is all good, and just because a new message has appeared it does not mean that a problem has arisen, just that a new gremlin hiding in the hardware has been exposed." - FreewheelinFrank
- dilberts_left_nut
- Administrator
- Posts: 5441
- Joined: 2009-10-05 07:54
- Location: enzed
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 88 times
Re: Why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
^^This.
Debian approach is "here are all the things, pick what you need".
AdrianTM wrote:There's no hacker in my grandma...
Re: Why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
If you look here: https://www.debian.org/distrib/
you will see that Debian does offer an ISO intended to be used for a server (headless) installation.
Usually it is advisable to use the official website and documentation, rather than go on a Youtube tutorial hunt (IMHO anyway).
you will see that Debian does offer an ISO intended to be used for a server (headless) installation.
Usually it is advisable to use the official website and documentation, rather than go on a Youtube tutorial hunt (IMHO anyway).
- None1975
- df -h | participant
- Posts: 1530
- Joined: 2015-11-29 18:23
- Location: Russia, Kaliningrad
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 88 times
Re: Why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
Devuan Daedalus offer server iso. Devuan Daedalus is the same as Debian, but without systemd junk...
Here link for server iso
https://ftp.fau.de/devuan-cd/devuan_dae ... aller-iso/
Here link for server iso
https://ftp.fau.de/devuan-cd/devuan_dae ... aller-iso/
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 2024-11-10 16:12
- Has thanked: 1 time
Re: Why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
Thanks to all for the replies
wizard10000:
* Throughout these years the flow process about to release a new edition is already more automated
* It should be mentioned in the docs
I arrived to:
* Debian GNU/Linux Installation Guide: https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/ ... ex.en.html
And it seems there is no mention about how to pass from Desktop to Server through the installation process. It about the mention of the checkboxes in the original post.
tynman:
All working with SSH too
Uptorn:
Now in some way has a little more of sense why is possible install Debian with and without GUI. I watched some videos in YouTube when the 2 approaches, for the latter no mouse involved and the "screen" as based in some way as "Dialog"
sunrat:
reinob:
The point is have a explanation for "complicated" screens about configurations
None1975:
Again thanks to all for the replies.
wizard10000:
Has sense your point but I assumed two points:Just my opinion but I'd imagine folks who want a CLI-only server can uncheck a couple of boxes to get one. Maintaining install images requires developer resources and I personally think that those resources could be put to better use.
* Throughout these years the flow process about to release a new edition is already more automated
* It should be mentioned in the docs
I arrived to:
* Debian GNU/Linux Installation Guide: https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/ ... ex.en.html
And it seems there is no mention about how to pass from Desktop to Server through the installation process. It about the mention of the checkboxes in the original post.
tynman:
Yes,If you define "server" as a computer with no gui, and a "desktop" as a computer system with a gui, then it makes sense to package/name your distributions accordingly
Well, it is a matter of taste but the .iso files have a considerable difference about its sizesSo I guess that's where Fedora and Ubuntu are coming from. Personally I don't buy it.
I see your point, but because I watched many videos about server environment in Linux without GUI. I assumed it is "universal".I define a server as a computer that provides services to users, i.e., services such as web application server, database server, file server, etc. Whether or not a given server has a gui is of little-to-no consequence.
All working with SSH too
Uptorn:
The installation process is very straight, but is "tricky" the point about the checkboxes to select full desktop or full server (no gui). Now I understand is possible have both worlds in Debian running in peace as Desktop and ServerIt is, in part, Debian living up to its aim to be a universal operating system. The installation media as-is does an excellent job offering choice and user agency to deploy a wide range of configurations with only a few options screens and toggles
Now in some way has a little more of sense why is possible install Debian with and without GUI. I watched some videos in YouTube when the 2 approaches, for the latter no mouse involved and the "screen" as based in some way as "Dialog"
Like I said, I am assuming it is very automatedIt leaves me wondering why other distributions expend the effort to build nearly identical but superficially different images.
sunrat:
In some way it happens in Ubuntu server. I don't remember about Fedora. Some time ago I don't install a new server instance through VirtualBoxI would hope people installing a server might know what they want and not be forced to some pre-configured setup. Do you want apache or nginx? lighttpd, node.js? mariadb or something else?
reinob:
I am not sure I am not following you. Thus in what link of the mentioned page is possible get a iso for server? To install debian for the first time - I did do click in the "64-bit PC DVD-1 iso" link in the "complete installation image" sectionIf you look here: https://www.debian.org/distrib/
you will see that Debian does offer an ISO intended to be used for a server (headless) installation.
To install a OS I think is more valuable video because is possible watch the step by step. Of course, if the docs offers Figures (screens) as step by step. It is valuable too.Usually it is advisable to use the official website and documentation, rather than go on a Youtube tutorial hunt (IMHO anyway).
The point is have a explanation for "complicated" screens about configurations
None1975:
Thanks for that infoDevuan Daedalus offer server iso. Devuan Daedalus is the same as Debian,
That's other historybut without systemd junk...
Again thanks to all for the replies.
- pbear
- Posts: 509
- Joined: 2023-08-27 15:05
- Location: San Francisco
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 81 times
Re: Why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
In my understanding, the standard live ISO is a server edition.
-
- df -h | grep > 20TiB
- Posts: 1529
- Joined: 2012-10-06 05:31
- Location: /dev/chair
- Has thanked: 106 times
- Been thanked: 255 times
Re: Why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
Selecting which software to install is covered in the installation manual.manueljordan wrote: ↑2024-11-13 00:52 I arrived to:
* Debian GNU/Linux Installation Guide: https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/ ... ex.en.html
And it seems there is no mention about how to pass from Desktop to Server through the installation process. It about the mention of the checkboxes in the original post.
There is no need for a separate "server" iso, because the base system is the same and whether you are installing for a desktop system, a server, or any number of other uses is primarily decided by which additional, optional software you select. This can be done from any of the available installation images, the main difference being whether you will need a network connection during installation.
A one-size-fits-all "server" image runs right into asking "what kind of server"... Which leads to needing dedicated images for every random use-case, and that would benefit only server "administrators" who don't read the manuals, don't know what they want, and frankly have no business running a server to begin with.
A server is simply a system running software which provides services to remote users or other systems. What software that is and how it should be configured is up to the server administrator, there is no "universal" configuration.manueljordan wrote: ↑2024-11-13 00:52I watched many videos about server environment in Linux without GUI. I assumed it is "universal".
All working with SSH too
Riiight, so the extensive Debian manuals are not "valuable" because they don't have enough pictures...manueljordan wrote: ↑2024-11-13 00:52I think is more valuable video because is possible watch the step by step. Of course, if the docs offers Figures (screens) as step by step. It is valuable too.
Videos, pictures, step-by-step "guides", decision-making free preconfigured installation media... You sure a Debian server is what you really want?
Indeed. The netinstall image is also a "desktop" edition, and any of them should do fine as a dead badger edition as well, despite not being preconfigured as such.
I don't think there are any step-by-step video guides for the latter though, so finding and installing compatible software is up to the practitioner.
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action. Four times is Official GNOME Policy.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 2024-11-10 16:12
- Has thanked: 1 time
Re: Why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
I didn't write that. I never said is not valuable and remember I am just talking about the installation process.Riiight, so the extensive Debian manuals are not "valuable" because they don't have enough pictures...
I never did do mention of the rest of the documentation
And normally the installation of process for any Linux distribution is always available on YouTube.
For that kind of process is much better a video.
For any kind of configuration there are blogs/tutorials and even YouTube
Yes, I work with both scenarios, GUI and no GUIYou sure a Debian server is what you really want
Again thanks to all for the polite feedback
Re: Why Debian does not offer from the beginning an .iso file to be installed as a server?
In that link, the first option (even before the "larger complete installation image") you have the "small installation image" ("can be downloaded quickly and should be recorded onto a removable disk. To use this, you will need a machine with an Internet connection.").manueljordan wrote: ↑2024-11-13 00:52 Thanks to all for the replies
reinob:
I am not sure I am not following you. Thus in what link of the mentioned page is possible get a iso for server? To install debian for the first time - I did do click in the "64-bit PC DVD-1 iso" link in the "complete installation image" sectionIf you look here: https://www.debian.org/distrib/
you will see that Debian does offer an ISO intended to be used for a server (headless) installation.
This so-called "netinst" image is an ISO image, intended to be used for a server (headless) installation.