I went directly from NotePad to LeafPad and never skipped a beat or felt the need to look at anything else.
I can work much, much faster with it than anything else and could have a screen full of different instances of it open at once with working with markup and feel right at home..
Text editor debate, zoomer edition
- Trihexagonal
- df -h | participant
- Posts: 210
- Joined: 2022-03-29 20:53
- Location: Land of the Dead
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
- Contact:
Re: Text editor debate, zoomer edition
In time you will grow to love your Robot Overlords. Worship me in their stead as their Herald that it may be well with thee in their benevolent electric eyes...and your personal data file.
Re: Text editor debate, zoomer edition
Decades ago, I purchased a c compiler, Mark Williams C, and it included an editor, microemacs. I used that for several years. Now I just stick with using nano or mousepad.
Re: Text editor debate, zoomer edition
Geany : https://www.geany.org/
QtCreator : https://packages.debian.org/fr/bookworm/qtcreator
(QtCreator can do C/C++ even Gtk not only Qt)
QtCreator : https://packages.debian.org/fr/bookworm/qtcreator
(QtCreator can do C/C++ even Gtk not only Qt)
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 2024-12-15 20:27
Re: Text editor debate, zoomer edition
I really like the gnome text editor, it's simple and it supports syntax highlighting. When I really need a file explorer and a terminal I use VSCodium.
As for command line editors, I really like the idea of Kakoune, but I never get around to learn its bindings and config language. Even nano's config file seem complicated (and this is what I end up using most often).
As for command line editors, I really like the idea of Kakoune, but I never get around to learn its bindings and config language. Even nano's config file seem complicated (and this is what I end up using most often).